Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all guarantee law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents in the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.
Generally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes Individuals in distinct violation of established case regulation) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and also the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Just a couple years in the past, searching for case precedent was a hard and time consuming process, demanding persons to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case legislation search options, and several sources offer free access to case regulation.
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court during the United States. Reduce courts over the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its possess judicial system that features trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is usually referred to as being the “supreme” court, While there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Even though state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano click here and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Female don't approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, except for most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. What's more, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.